A report from GHTC and Policy Cures Research examines how US federal funding for global health R&D is delivering impact both abroad and at home.

Search the GHTC website

Price addresses innovation, infectious diseases, NIH support at nomination hearings

Read time:
Flickr/Mark Taylor

At his nomination hearings, Secretary of Health and Human Services-designee Tom Price addressed global health and infectious diseases; innovation for rare diseases; support for health innovation, NIH, and priority setting for NIH-funded research. GHTC covers what he had to say.

January 26, 2017 by Courtney Carson

Representative Tom Price. Photo: Flickr/Mark TaylorRepresentative Tom Price. Photo: Flickr/Mark TaylorThe Senate continues to consider the nomination of Representative Tom Price (R-GA) to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), following his nomination hearings before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, which concluded yesterday. If confirmed, Price will assume leadership of a department that plays a critical role in advancing the development of new global health innovations through its sub-agencies including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Food and Drug Administration. As head, Representative Price will play an influential role in strategy and decision-making at these agencies.

Price did not directly discuss HHS’s engagement in global health research at either hearing, but he did address global health and infectious diseases; innovation for rare diseases; support for health innovation, NIH, and priority setting for NIH-funded research.

Here’s what he said:

Global health and infectious diseases

Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) questioned Representative Price on how the reinstatement and expansion of the Global Gag Rule under the Trump administration will affect HHS operations and active participation in international global health bodies. This rule restricts all US global health funding from being used to support international organizations that provide abortion services, counseling, or referrals; or advocate for the liberalization of abortion laws, even if they do so without US funds. Senator Cardin asked Representative Price how he will ensure the United States can “fully participate” in global health efforts to address “maternal health, to help stopping the spread and ending HIV and AIDS […] to make sure that the next Zika virus, that we [are] able to contain it so it doesn't cause the catastrophic effects if the Global Gag Rule is enforced in a way that prevents us from participating in international health organizations?

While Representative Price didn’t address the impact of the Global Gag Rule on HHS’s international engagement in response, he did stress the importance    of active engagement in the global response to infectious diseases, calling the question “really important,” and noting that his goal if confirmed    is to “gather the best minds and the best talent that we have within the department and without and determine what is wisest policy for this nation    to have [as] it relates to […] infectious disease.” He further elaborated on his support for ongoing infectious disease work saying, “germs    know no geographic boundaries. And we do incredible work, the work that the CDC does and the work that's done by others in our nation that try to prevent    infectious disease, work to detect the spread of infectious disease and then provide a logical and methodical and aggressive response to the outbreak    of any infectious disease is absolutely vital to protect the American people, and we're committed to doing so.” S

Senator Cardin expressed his agreement and hope that Representative Price “will look at perhaps unintended consequences from […] executive orders that could compromise our ability to be as effective as we need to, using all tools at our disposal.”

While under previous administrations, the Global Gag Rule only applied to organizations receiving family planning–specific funds—which account for about US$600 million in federal funding—the expanded version of the rule applies to organizations that receive any global health money. This means that approximately $9.5 billion in US funding for global health programs administered by the US Agency for International Development, the State Department, and HHS—which address a range of issues including maternal and child health, nutrition, HIV and AIDS (including the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), malaria, tuberculosis (TB), and other infectious diseases—is subject to the rule. This could have a dramatic impact on the ability of organizations funded by US global health accounts to team with international partners to develop, test, roll out, and monitor new global health technologies around the world.

Rare diseases and the Orphan Drug Act

CDC research. Photo: CDC/Dr. Scott SmithCDC research. Photo: CDC/Dr. Scott SmithSenator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) discussed rare diseases, attesting that the Affordable Care Act prevents “investments and innovative therapies that can cure and save lives.” He asked Representative Price what steps he believes “will improve the pipeline for rare disease therapies to bring treatments and cures to patients in desperate need of hope.”

Price replied that the Orphan Drug Act has “revolutionized the ability to treat rare diseases” and that it made “the United States the leader in coming forward with treatments for rare diseases.” He highlighted that there are actions the government can take “in terms of patent protection, in terms of liability, in terms of incentivization [of] resources to be able to encourage the discovery of cures for rare diseases” but stopped short of providing details about specific reforms or new policies he proposes. Price also said that the Orphan Drug Act, which Senator Hatch cited as creating “an explosion” of drugs for rare diseases is “one of the success stories truly for public policy in the country.”

Rare diseases are defined as diseases that affect less than 200,000 people in the United States, or those for which investment in a new product is not expected to yield financial return. The Orphan Drug Act, and other provisions to incentivize the development of tools for rare diseases, can also be used to support the development of new technologies for neglected diseases, which affect millions of people around the world, yet few in the United States. Continued support for vehicles that advance the development of tools for orphan and rare diseases—in addition to new steps to ensure that these programs work to support neglected disease research and development (R&D)—is critical to advancing US support for global health R&D.

Health innovation, NIH, and the prioritization of research funding

Discussing Representative Price’s commitment to public service, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) asked, “What are your motives? [...] What are your goals? [...] Do you want more people to have health care? Or do you think we disagree on just how we do it and not necessarily on the motives?” In listing principles that he believes are “absolutely imperative for a health care system,” Representative Price said that the system must incentivize innovation “because it is innovation that drives high-quality health care.”

Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) cited biomedical research as a “passion,” noting that “if we invest in biomedical research, we have the possibility of not only improving lives for Americans and curing or coming up with effective treatments for devastating diseases, but also lowering health care costs.”

When asked by Senator Collins if he supports “increases for the NIH” passed last year and under consideration this year, Price replied, “NIH is a treasure for our country, and the kind of thing we should be doing to find cures for those diseases. One of the core avenues to be able to make that happen is through NIH, and I supported the increase [as a member of Congress].”

Senator Patrick Toomey (R-PA) also questioned Representative Price on his views on NIH research and allocation of resources. Citing 5.2 million Americans with Alzheimer’s—a disease for which there is no cure or treatment—Senator Toomey noted that NIH spending on the disease is $168 per diagnosed patient and asked if Representative Price would commit to “ensure that we have a better proportionality in terms of the allocation of resources and the breadth and severity of illnesses.” Representative Price responded, “I think it's absolutely imperative, Senator, and I look forward to working with you.”

NIH is the largest financial supporter of global health R&D in the world. Its work to advance basic research on infectious diseases like HIV and AIDS, TB, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, and emerging diseases like Ebola and Zika—as well as research in maternal and child health—has led to important scientific breakthroughs that have transformed treatment in the United States and around the world. Continued and robust support for these research areas is critical to ongoing progress in global health.

At GHTC, we will continue to monitor Price’s views on US support for global health and medical innovation and urge strong support for programs that further the development and rollout of urgently needed global health technologies.

Categories: HHS, NIH

About the author

Courtney CarsonGHTC

Courtney Carson is a policy and advocacy officer at GHTC, who leads GHTC's US advocacy portfolio.

Other Breakthroughs Blog posts you may like:
PATH/Katrina Peach
January 29, 2017

Research Roundup: Swine flu, drug resistance, and hepatitis C cures

Written by Kat Kelley / GHTC
Read time:
In this regular feature on Breakthroughs, we highlight some of the most interesting reads in global health research from the past week. The location of pig farms can influence human flu patterns, as farmworkers may be among the first exposed to new strains of swine flu. Researchers at Duke University compared a map of North Carolina’s concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFOs) to the location and timing of flu outbreaks in the state, concluding that counties with high numbers of CAFOs experience early peaks of flu cases during years in which a strain of swine flu is in circulation. However, the same effect was not seen in years when the most common strains of influenza did not originate in pigs. The trend is likely attributable to transmission of swine flu from pigs to farmworkers, and subsequently to their family and friends. While efforts targeting CAFOs, such as animal surveillance or vaccination, could decrease human risk for swine flu, a more affordable and immediate solution is for farmworkers and their families to get a flu shot as early as possible each year. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) may be more infectious than previously believed, according to new research out of South Africa. Tuberculosis (TB) is difficult to treat as patients must take multiple pills a day over months or even years. When patients are unable to complete the regimen, the bacteria can grow resistant to the medicines, resulting in multidrug-resistant and XDR TB. However, a study of 404 XDR patients in South Africa suggests that only one-third of cases are due to treatment failures, whereas the remaining cases resulted from person-to-person transmission. These findings indicate that combatting XDR TB will require both improved treatment for TB patients and enhanced prevention and detection efforts. A common fungal infection, Candida auris, is growing increasingly drug resistant. Strains that are resistant to all three classes of antifungals have been reported in five continents. As with antibiotic resistance, antifungal resistance has emerged as a result of inappropriate and overuse of antifungals, and while it may not be as widespread, there are fewer classes of antifungals, providing few alternatives if a treatment fails. An investigation of 54 samples of C. auris found that nearly all were resistant to the first-line medicine (fluconazole), 22 were resistant to both the first and second-line treatments, and 2 were resistant to all three classes of antifungals. Further, standard approaches to disinfecting hospital rooms and equipment are insufficient to eliminate C. auris, increasing the risk of hospital-acquired infections. While cases remain limited, the fungus has an extremely high fatality rate, killing 60 to 70 percent of those infected. Nine recently approved and widely used hepatitis C medicines may have serious, unexpected side effects, including liver failure. The new antivirals cure nearly all patients, have fewer side effects than older medicines, and significantly shorten the duration of treatment. However, a new report published by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices details adverse effects, including potentially fatal liver failure and reactivation of the closely related hepatitis B. At this time, cases are rare and the findings are inconclusive, as the Institute did not have access to patients’ medical records that could shed light on whether the side effects preceded treatment. Now, the Food and Drug Administration is calling on physicians to screen and monitor for hepatitis B in patients taking the new medicines, and a similar approach might be needed to rule out the risk of liver failure.
CDC/James Gathany
January 22, 2017

Research Roundup: Bacteria-sniffing dogs, vaccines for epidemics, and more

Written by Kat Kelley / GHTC
Read time:
In this regular feature on Breakthroughs, we highlight some of the most interesting reads in global health research from the past week. An English springer spaniel has been trained to sniff out Clostridium difficile, a drug-resistant bacterium that infects nearly half a million Americans and costs the US health system an estimated US$1 billion annually. The two-year-old pup—Angus—was tapped for the job after Teresa Zurberg, who normally trains dogs to sniff out bombs and drugs, almost lost her life to C. difficile. Zurberg’s husband, a nurse, had read about a now-retired beagle in the Netherlands that had been trained to smell the bacteria on patients, and the couple approached the local health authorities, suggesting their new pup would be a prime candidate for such a job. Now, after extensive training, Angus is an official employee of Vancouver General Hospital, where he moves from room to room, searching for traces of the bacteria, which are then destroyed using ultraviolet light. As nearly two-thirds of C. difficile cases are acquired in hospitals, dogs like Angus could have a significant impact in not just detecting, but preventing, new cases of C. difficile. Launched last week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) seeks to develop vaccines against the diseases most likely to cause the next major pandemic. The coalition was established by the governments of Norway, Japan, and Germany in partnership with philanthropic organizations the Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Collectively, these partners have pledged US$460 million to the initiative, half of what is needed for CEPI’s first five years of operation. During its initial phase, CEPI will focus on advancing two experimental vaccines for each of the three viruses that have been identified by the World Health Organization as leading contenders for the next major pandemic: Lassa fever, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and Nipah virus. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CREs), a class of deadly, drug-resistant bugs that have been deemed “nightmare bacteria” by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be more prevalent and virulent than previously realized. These bacteria often contain specific genes that enable them to evade different types of antibiotics, including carbapenems, potent drugs that are often reserved as the last line of treatment against drug-resistant infections. To better understand their evolution and spread, researchers at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology sequenced the genomes of 263 CREs, collected from patients at four hospitals. The results revealed that carbapenem resistance is emerging across diverse types of bacteria and that the genes that confer resistance can be transferred between distinct bacterial families. Even more alarming: some CREs don’t have any of the known resistance genes, meaning that there are either more, unidentified resistance genes than we are aware of or that CREs have developed other ways to resist antibiotics. The study also indicates that CREs can be carried and transmitted asymptomatically, making surveillance of these dangerous infections all the more difficult.